Zhejiang Jinxing

The aggressive editorials came after China yesterday lodged a protest with Indian Ambassador Vijay Gokhale here over the Tibetan spiritual leaders visit to the area.   dalai lama, kashmir, dispute, interfere  Location: China, Peking, Peking  Related StoriesChina protests Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh, vows actionIndia never used me against China: Dalai Lama‘No problem if anyone calls me a demon’: Dalai Lama."Southern Tibet, on the other hand, was stolen from China by his countrys former colonial master taking advantage of Chinas internal strife. Using it as leverage, therefore, is not just unethical, it is outright illicit," it said.Stating that India is dissatisfied with China over the NSG and Azhar issues, it said some Indians also called for boycott of Chinese goods.Taking exception to Rijijus remarks, the papers said India is using the Dalai Lama as a "diplomatic tool" against China for its "vice like veto" against Indias membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and UN ban on Jaish-e- Mohammed chief Masood Azhar."New Delhi probably overestimates its leverage in the bilateral ties with China."New Delhi not only allowed the 14th Dalai Lama to visit Southern Tibet, a historical Chinese territory India has illicitly occupied and refers to as Arunachal Pradesh, but the spiritual leader of Tibetan independence was also escorted on the trip by Indias junior minister of home affairs," the editorial read. When it has a grudge against China, it may prompt the Dalai to play certain tricks as a signal sent to China," it said. At a time when the Dalai has been given a cold shoulder in many places of the world, New Delhi is bucking the trend and treating him as a favourite," it said.Two English newspapers – China Daily and Global Times – have launched a scathing attack on India after Minister of State for Home ******en Rijiju said that Arunachal Pradesh – which China claims as part of Southern Tibet -- is "an inseparable part of India"."Before this trip, the Dalai Lama was received by Indian President Pranab Mukherjee in December. In other words, Indian occupation of the area is legally untenable."China considers India as a friendly neighbour and partner."The Dalai Lama has been to the disputed region before, but what makes this trip different is that he is received and accompanied by Indias Junior Home Minister ******en Rijiju.World South Asia06 Apr 2017China could interfere in 'turbulent' J&K: Chinese media on Dalai visit  World, South Asia  China could interfere in 'turbulent' J&K: Chinese media on Dalai visit   THE ASIAN AGE WITH AGENCY INPUTS  Published:  Apr 6. 2017. 11:36 am IST  Updated:  Apr 6. 2017. 12:27 pm IST   An editorial in Global Times flaunted Beijing&injection molding machine Company039;s military power and wondered if India would be able to defeat China in a "geopolitical game"."Neither the McMahon Line, by which New Delhi justifies its actual control of Southern Tibet nor the present-day Arunachal Pradesh has Beijings endorsement."To Beijing, that is a double affront," it said."When India emphasises the relationship with China, it would place a tight control on the Dalai.China claims large parts of northeastern state Arunachal Pradesh as Southern Tibet and Aksai Chin area of Kashmir, which it occupied during the 1962 war."When the Dalai travels to the capital of a Western country, who will meet him, when and where would be carefully weighed," it said. New Delhi should respond to Beijings goodwill with goodwill," it said."The Dalai question became one of the problems that upset the Sino-India relationship," it said. However, as dissatisfied as China was, it didnt make an issue of them," it said."It is worth mentioning that India is dissatisfied with China mainly in the international multilateral field," it said, adding that China too suffered "setbacks when applying for the membership of international organisations".It further stated that China should not hesitate to answer "blows with blows" if India chooses to play dirty by allowing the Dalai Lama to visit Arunachal Pradesh.When China raised the concern over the visit, Rijiju commented that China shouldnt intervene in their internal affairs," it said."Despite the historical dispute, the China-India border area has by and large remained peaceful recently, particularly since Beijing and New Delhi began to get serious about border talks," it said. If New Delhi ruins the Sino- India ties and the two countries turn into open rivals, can India afford the consequence?," the tabloid, known for striking aggressive nationalistic postures, said."If New Delhi chooses to play dirty, however, Beijing should not hesitate to answer blows with blows," the paper said. The Dalai Lama is currently on a nine-day visit to Arunachal Pradesh.An editorial in the state-run China Daily, The Global Times, flaunted Beijings military power and wondered if India would be able to defeat China in a "geopolitical game"."But this is a clumsy and rude move."Chinas proposal to blacklist some terrorist group had also been refused."India has benefited from the good momentum of bilateral relationship as much as China."The Dalais visit to Arunachal Pradesh this time is seen as New Delhi using the monk as a diplomatic tool to put pressure on China," it said. (Photo: PTI)    Beijing: The Chinese media on Thursday said that India, in a "clumsy and rude move", is using the Dalai Lama "as a diplomatic tool to put pressure on China" and that Beijing could in turn interfere in "turbulent" Kashmir. The two countries in recent years have continuously strived to improve their relationship and the peace on the border area has been maintained," it said. For any country, its attitude toward the Dalai Lama almost affects the entire relationship with China," Global Times said, adding that the western countries "fully recognised" this and were "extremely prudent" in using him as a "diplomatic card". Should he have any questions regarding the status of Southern Tibet, Rijiju can consult the historical archives," it said."With a GDP several times higher than that of India, military capabilities that can reach the Indian Ocean and having good relations with Indias peripheral nations, coupled with the fact that Indias turbulent northern state borders China, if China # engages in a geopolitical game with India, will Beijing lose to New Delhi?" the editorial read. "Rijiju might think himself cute in borrowing a line from Beijings diplomatic representations, but he has ignored the fundamental distinction here: Like Taiwan and any other part of China, Tibet is a part of the Chinese territory no matter whether New Delhi agrees or not," it said in an editorial. The Dalai is a highly-politicised symbol in Chinas diplomacy. China has never provoked bilateral disputes or made any pressing demand on India over the Dalai Lama.In its editorial, the ruling CPC-run Global Times criticised Rijiju for accompanying the Dalai Lama during his visit to the state.